5,332
edits
Computer Science Conferences: Difference between revisions
→Ranking
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Higher ranked conferences are not necessarily harder to get into than second-tier but are more prestigious and will get you more citations. | * Higher ranked conferences are not necessarily harder to get into than second-tier but are more prestigious and will get you more citations. | ||
* Usually, you should submit to a few top tier conferences first even if you're not that confident. They will also often get you more critical reviewers which will point out | * Usually, you should submit to a few top tier conferences first even if you're not that confident. They will also often get you more critical reviewers which will point out better directions to improve your paper. | ||
* Most papers are borderline papers and will get rejected on their first submission. Some people say if your papers are getting into accepted on the first submission, then you need to pick more selective conferences. | * Most papers are borderline papers and will get rejected on their first submission. Some people say if your papers are getting into accepted on the first submission, then you need to pick more selective conferences. | ||
* Avoid bottom-tier conferences and pay-to-publish journals. These have high acceptance but may hurt the reputation of your work and are typically not indexed in ACM DL or IEEE Xplore. | * Avoid bottom-tier conferences and pay-to-publish journals. These have high acceptance but may hurt the reputation of your work and are typically not indexed in ACM DL or IEEE Xplore. | ||