Image Registration: Difference between revisions

Line 73: Line 73:
* \(n_\rho\) be the number of samples (i.e. resolution) along the \(\rho\) axis
* \(n_\rho\) be the number of samples (i.e. resolution) along the \(\rho\) axis
* \(n_\theta\) be the number of samples along the \(\theta\) axis
* \(n_\theta\) be the number of samples along the \(\theta\) axis
* \(r_i\) the radius size for pixel \(i=1,...,n_\rho\)
* \(r_i\) the radius size for pixel <math display="inline">i=1,...,n_\rho</math>
* \(\theta = 0,...,n_\theta - 1\)
* <math display="inline">\theta = 0,...,n_\theta - 1</math>


To prevent undersampling along \(\rho\), we must have \(R_{n_\rho} - R_{n_\rho-1} \leq 1\).
To prevent undersampling along \(\rho\), we must have \(R_{n_\rho} - R_{n_\rho-1} \leq 1\).
Line 81: Line 81:


This leads to the following equations:<br>
This leads to the following equations:<br>
<math>
<math display="block">
\begin{align}
\begin{align}
R_i &= \exp(i \times \frac{\log R_{max}}{n_\rho}), \qquad R_{max} = R_{n_\rho}\\
R_i &= \exp(i \times \frac{\log R_{max}}{n_\rho}), \qquad R_{max} = R_{n_\rho}\\
Line 88: Line 88:
\end{align}
\end{align}
</math>
</math>
However, using these would lead to oversampling of the fovea region wasting computation resources.
However, using these would lead to oversampling of the fovea region wasting computation resources.
}}
}}