Unsupervised Learning: Difference between revisions
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
====Algorithm==== | ====Algorithm==== | ||
# Randomly initialize labels <math>\mathbf{z}</math>. | |||
# Then calculate the centroids <math>\mathbf{\mu}</math>. | |||
# Then update the labels for each example to the closest centroid. | |||
# Update the centroids by taking the mean of each point in the cluster. | |||
# Repeat steps 3 and 4 | |||
===Soft K-means=== | ===Soft K-means=== | ||
We will develop a model for how our data is generated:<br> | We will develop a model for how our data is generated:<br> | ||
Given <math>k</math> clusters, the probability of a point being from cluster k is <math>\phi_k = P(z^{(i)} = k)</math><br> | Given <math>k</math> clusters, the probability of a point being from cluster k is <math>\phi_k = P(z^{(i)} = k)</math><br> |
Revision as of 17:54, 12 November 2019
Basics of Unsupervised Learning
Clustering
Given points \(\displaystyle \{x^{(1)},...,x^{(m)}\}\) we wish to group them into clusters 1,...,k.
Usually we are given the number of clusters, k.
The problem is to assign labels \(\displaystyle \{z^{(1)},...,z^{(m)}\}\) where \(\displaystyle z^{(i)} \in \{1,...,k\}\)
K-means
Here we wish to cluster them to minimize the distance to the mean of their cluster.
In our formulation we have k clusters.
The mean of each cluster \(\displaystyle \mu_i\) is called the centroid.</math>
Optimization
Let \(\displaystyle \mathbf{\mu}\) denote the centroids and let \(\displaystyle \mathbf{z}\) denote the cluster labels for our data.
Our loss function is \(\displaystyle L(\mu, \mathbf{z}) = \sum_{i} \Vert x^{(i)} - \mu_{z^{(i)}} \Vert ^2\).
- Using coordinate-block descent
\(\displaystyle L(\mu, \mathbf{z}) = \sum_{i} \Vert x^{(i)} - \mu_{z^{(i)}} \Vert ^2\).
If we fix \(\displaystyle \mu\) then we have only need to minimize \(\displaystyle z^{(i)}\).
Since each term of the sum is independent, we simply choose the closest centroid for each point
If we fix \(\displaystyle \mathbf{z}\) then we need to minimize \(\displaystyle L(\mu, \mathbf{z})\) wrt \(\displaystyle \mu\).
Taking the gradient and setting it to 0 we get:
\(\displaystyle
kmo
\begin{align}
\nabla L(\mu, \mathbf{z}) &= \nabla \sum_{i} \Vert x^{(i)} - \mu_{z^{(i)}} \Vert ^2\\
&= \nabla \sum_{j=1}{k} \sum_{i\mid z(i)=j} \Vert x^{(i)} - \mu_{z^{(i)}} \Vert ^2\\
&= \nabla \sum_{j=1}{k} \sum_{i\mid z(i)=j} \Vert x^{(i)} - \mu_{j} \Vert ^2\\
&= \sum_{j=1}{k} \sum_{i\mid z(i)=j} \nabla \Vert x^{(i)} - \mu_{j} \Vert ^2\\
&= \sum_{j=1}{k} \sum_{i\mid z(i)=j} \nabla \Vert x^{(i)} - \mu_{j} \Vert ^2\\
&= \sum_{j=1}{k} \sum_{i\mid z(i)=j} 2(x^{(i)} - \mu_{j})\\
\implies \mu_{j} &= (\sum_{i\mid z(i)=j} x^{(i)})/(\sum_{i\mid z(i)=j} 1) \quad \forall j
\end{align}
\)
- Notes
This procedure will yield us a sequence of parameters and losses.
\(\displaystyle \mu^{0}, z^{0}, \mu^1, z^1, ...\)
\(\displaystyle L(0) \geq L(1) \geq L(2) \geq ...\)
- Since the loss is monotone decreasing and bounded below, it will converge by the monotone convergence theorem.
- However, this does not imply that the parameters \(\displaystyle \mathbf{\mu}\) and \(\displaystyle \mathbf{z}\) will converge.
Algorithm
- Randomly initialize labels \(\displaystyle \mathbf{z}\).
- Then calculate the centroids \(\displaystyle \mathbf{\mu}\).
- Then update the labels for each example to the closest centroid.
- Update the centroids by taking the mean of each point in the cluster.
- Repeat steps 3 and 4
Soft K-means
We will develop a model for how our data is generated:
Given \(\displaystyle k\) clusters, the probability of a point being from cluster k is \(\displaystyle \phi_k = P(z^{(i)} = k)\)