5,336
edits
Writing Papers: Difference between revisions
→Evaluation
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
===Method=== | ===Method=== | ||
===Evaluation=== | ===Evaluation=== | ||
===Discussion=== | |||
In the discussion section you can analyse the results from your experiments if you didn't do so in the evaluation section. | |||
You can also discuss limitations to your method and potential followup topics. | |||
Finally, you can also discuss what additional applications your method might be useful for. | |||
However, try to avoid excessive speculation. | |||
===Conclusion=== | ===Conclusion=== | ||
==Maximizing Acceptance Chances== | ==Maximizing Acceptance Chances== | ||
* Go through the previous proceedings of the conference you're submitting to and make sure you cite all relevant work. Chances are, those authors will be reviewing your paper and won't appreciate it if your manuscript is missing citations to their work. If there are no relevant work, consider choosing a different conference. | * Go through the previous proceedings of the conference you're submitting to and make sure you cite all relevant work. Chances are, those authors will be reviewing your paper and won't appreciate it if your manuscript is missing citations to their work. If there are no relevant work, consider choosing a different conference. | ||