Jump to content

Giving Talks: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "Some principles about how to give talks. ==Heilmeier Catechism== [https://www.darpa.mil/work-with-us/heilmeier-catechism Link] * What are you trying to do? Articulate your o...")
 
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
* How long will it take?
* How long will it take?
* What are the mid-term and final “exams” to check for success?
* What are the mid-term and final “exams” to check for success?
==Overview and Introduction of Papers==
* Give intuition behind the method. What led up to this idea?
* Selling a paper vs. Giving an unbiased overview
** Make sure to mention limitations and weaknesses
** What parts of the problem can still be improved?
** What problems are still unsolved by the technique?
* Quality vs. performance
** If the paper only mentions one, it probably suffers in the other.
** "A few milliseconds" How many? 5ms? 500ms?
** "High-resolution" How high? 64x64? 8k?